![]() ![]() Intel isn’t even a factor in this conversation, either. The RTX 4090, by comparison, easily cracks 100 fps in most games at 4K and often goes higher. Even at standard 4K, the RX 7900 XTX will hover around 60 frames per second (fps) to 100 fps in the most demanding games, far below the refresh rate that Samsung’s monitor is capable of. Limited potential Jacob Roach / Digital Trendsįor as powerful as AMD’s RX 7900 XTX is, it’s nowhere near the RTX 4090. Worse, Nvidia’s GPUs are the only ones powerful enough to drive the resolution and refresh rate of the Odyssey Neo G9 they’re just hampered by the connection standard. They’ll work with the Odyssey Neo G9 due to DisplayPort’s backward compatibility, but not at the full resolution or refresh rate. Nvidia’s latest GPUs top out at DisplayPort 1.4a. The problem is that only AMD and Intel actually support DisplayPort 2.1 right now. The previous standard, DisplayPort 1.4a, only supports up to 25.92Gbps, so you need DisplayPort 2.1 to drive the Odyssey Neo G9 (2023) at its full resolution and refresh rate. It runs at a 240Hz refresh rate, and when paired with the resolution, it needs a bandwidth of 36.19Gbps with HDR off and 45Gbps with HDR on. ![]() It has half the vertical resolution.Īdvertising shenanigans aside, the new Odyssey Neo G9 needs DisplayPort 2.1. Samsung is billing this as an 8K monitor, but it’s not true 8K. If you can’t recognize the math, that’s two 3840 x 2160 ( 4K) screens put side-by-side. The Odyssey Neo G9 comes with a dual 4K resolution, with a pixel count of 7680 x 2160. Why DisplayPort 2.1 could become a big deal for PC gaming in 2023įirst, the why. Samsung’s first flat mini-LED gaming monitor doesn’t come cheapĪsus’ 4K, 32-inch mini-LED gaming monitor might hit the perfect sweet spot ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |